GPTBot vs ClaudeBot: Which AI Crawler Should You Allow or Block?
Complete side-by-side comparison of GPTBot (OpenAI) and ClaudeBot (Anthropic): user-agent strings, safety ratings, SEO impact, and copy-paste blocking rules. Updated August 2026.
Quick Verdict
Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot carry the same safety rating (Safe). Your decision should come down to whether you want your content used by OpenAI versus Anthropic, and whether each bot's purpose (training, search, or user requests) aligns with your content strategy.
| Attribute | GPTBot | ClaudeBot |
|---|---|---|
| Operator | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| User-agent string | GPTBot |
ClaudeBot |
| Category | AI & LLM Bots | AI & LLM Bots |
| Safety rating | Safe | Safe |
| SEO impact if blocked | Low - No SEO ranking impact | Low - No SEO ranking impact |
| Recommendation | Generally safe to allow; provides legitimate crawling value. | Generally safe to allow; provides legitimate crawling value. |
| Official docs | GPTBot docs | ClaudeBot docs |
What is GPTBot?
GPTBot is OpenAI's training crawler. The full profile covers the rest.
What is ClaudeBot?
ClaudeBot is Anthropic's training crawler. The full profile covers the rest.
GPTBot vs ClaudeBot by the numbers
GPTBot and ClaudeBot do the same kind of job (a training crawler), so most sites give them the same answer. The difference is who receives your content: OpenAI or Anthropic.
| Measure | GPTBot | ClaudeBot |
|---|---|---|
| robots.txt token | GPTBot | ClaudeBot |
| What it does | collects pages to train AI models | collects pages to train AI models |
| Crawler type | a training crawler | a training crawler |
| Priority tier | Tier 1 | Tier 1 |
| Follows robots.txt | Yes, per operator | Yes, per operator |
| Top-10k robots.txt files | 1,008 named (18.1%), 859 blocked (15.4%) | 858 named (15.4%), 805 blocked (14.4%) |
| Blocked by top 1k / middle / tail | 20.4% / 15.5% / 14.5% | 20.4% / 14.6% / 13.3% |
In our robots.txt study of the Tranco top 10,000 (5,583 valid files, fetched October 20, 2026), GPTBot is blocked more often than ClaudeBot: 859 files against 805. The counts are close, which suggests most sites that think about one also think about the other.
Writing rules for both
Because each crawler reads only the group that names it, you can give GPTBot and ClaudeBot different answers in the same file. A common pattern, refusing training while allowing search and assistant fetches, looks like this for these two:
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Disallow: /
- One group each. Do not rely on
User-agent: *to cover either crawler if you have named the other; name both. - Copy shared rules. Any
Disallowlines from the*group that should still apply must be repeated in each named group. - Mind the edge. A bot manager can refuse one and admit the other regardless of robots.txt.
- Verify both. The AI crawler tester shows how each is treated on your live site.
Test yourself: if you write User-agent: GPTBot and User-agent: ClaudeBot on consecutive lines above one Disallow: /, are both blocked?
Yes. Several User-agent lines in a row form one group, and the rules below apply to every name in it.
Test yourself: does blocking GPTBot also block ClaudeBot?
No. Each token is matched separately.
Which to allow, by goal
| Your goal | GPTBot | ClaudeBot |
|---|---|---|
| You want AI answers to cite you | Optional | Optional |
| You want to stop AI training | Block | Block |
| Your server is under load | Rate-limit | Rate-limit |
| You need search traffic | No effect | No effect |
Related: how AI engines choose their sources
Block GPTBot if you do not want your content used for training. Block ClaudeBot if you do not want your content used for training.
The rest of each operator's family
OpenAI also runs ChatGPT Agent, ChatGPT Operator, ChatGPT-User, ChatGPT-User/2.0, OAI-AdsBot. Rules for GPTBot do not cover them. Anthropic also runs anthropic-ai, Claude-Code, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, Claude-Web. Rules for ClaudeBot do not cover them.
Read the full profiles for both crawlers, linked in the table above, for documentation links, user-agent strings and server-side rules.
Mistakes when writing rules for GPTBot and ClaudeBot together
GPTBot is named in 18.1% of the top-site robots.txt files in our study and blocked in 15.4%; ClaudeBot is named in 15.4% of the top-site robots.txt files in our study and blocked in 14.4%. Large sites block GPTBot more often, which usually reflects a decision about training rather than about ClaudeBot.
- Both are a training crawlers, so the usual error is treating a rule for one as a rule for both. A group for
GPTBotsays nothing aboutClaudeBot; if you want the same treatment, list both lines above one set of rules. - They come from different operators (OpenAI and Anthropic), with different documentation and different update cycles. Do not assume a change one of them announces applies to the other.
- Putting
User-agent: GPTBotandUser-agent: ClaudeBotin separate groups and then editing only one. Two groups drift apart over time; keep a comment above each that says why it differs from the other.
Each crawler's own profile lists the mistakes that apply to it alone; this list is only about combining the two.
Spotting GPTBot and ClaudeBot in your logs
robots.txt says what GPTBot and ClaudeBot may do; your access logs show what they actually did.
Count requests
On a server with standard Nginx or Apache logs, this counts matching requests per day (adjust the log path for your host):
grep -iE "GPTBot|ClaudeBot" /var/log/nginx/access.log \
| awk '{print $4}' | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c
And this shows which paths it requested most, which is the quickest way to see whether your Disallow lines are being respected:
grep -iE "GPTBot|ClaudeBot" /var/log/nginx/access.log \
| awk '{print $7}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20
Check the requests are genuine
Anyone can send these user-agents, so confirm the source before acting on a match:
GPTBot: compare each address with the ranges atopenai.com/gptbot.json. A request claiming to be GPTBot from outside them is not genuine. Check it separately from ClaudeBot.ClaudeBot: compare each address with the ranges atclaude.com/crawling/bots.json. A request claiming to be ClaudeBot from outside them is not genuine. Check it separately from GPTBot.
Related: writing content AI engines can cite
How GPTBot and ClaudeBot moved in our latest scans
Between our scans of October 17, 2026 and October 20, 2026, files naming GPTBot went from 941 to 1,008 (+67) and files blocking it from 789 to 859 (+70), so more sites wrote a rule for GPTBot and more of those rules block it. For comparison, 2026 and October 20, 2026, files naming ClaudeBot went from 800 to 858 (+58) and files blocking it from 745 to 805 (+60), so more sites wrote a rule for ClaudeBot and more of those rules block it.
Over the 3 days between those scans, blocking of GPTBot moved +70 files and blocking of ClaudeBot moved +60. Owners are acting faster on GPTBot, which is the one to recheck first if you have not touched your file this month.
We first recorded GPTBot on March 17, 2026. OpenAI documents it on developers.openai.com, and we recheck that page before each release. We first recorded ClaudeBot on March 17, 2026. Anthropic documents it on support.claude.com, and we recheck that page before each release.
Among the 104 AI and LLM crawlers in our database, GPTBot sits ninth by priority (Tier 1), level with ChatGPT Agent, ChatGPT Operator, ChatGPT-User, ChatGPT-User/2.0. 81 of the 104 share its safe rating. On the ClaudeBot side: Among the 104 AI and LLM crawlers in our database, ClaudeBot sits seventh by priority (Tier 1), level with ChatGPT Agent, ChatGPT Operator, ChatGPT-User, ChatGPT-User/2.0. 81 of the 104 share its safe rating.
How top sites treat GPTBot and ClaudeBot
From our robots.txt study of the Tranco top 10,000 (5,583 valid files, fetched October 20, 2026):
GPTBot, the most blocked of the GPTBot and ClaudeBot tokens: blocked in 15.4% of files (663 with its own group, 196 throughUser-agent: *), more often by the top 1,000 (20.4%) than the long tail (14.5%).ClaudeBot, second of the GPTBot and ClaudeBot tokens: blocked in 14.4% of files (594 with its own group, 211 throughUser-agent: *), more often by the top 1,000 (20.4%) than the long tail (13.3%).
For scale, 20.1% of all files block at least one AI training crawler. GPTBot is one of the tokens driving that figure.
More questions about GPTBot and ClaudeBot
- Can I allow one and block the other?
- Yes. Give each its own
User-agentgroup with its own rules. Each crawler reads only the group that names it. - Which of the two visits more often?
- It depends on your site, your audience and how often your content changes. Your access logs are the reliable answer; the commands above count both.
- How long until a change applies?
- Crawlers commonly cache robots.txt for up to a day, so allow about 24 hours and confirm in your logs.
- Do I need to update my rules when either operator launches a new crawler?
- Often, yes. A new token is not covered by rules written for the old ones. Check this comparison and both profiles periodically, or rerun the AI bot checker after any announcement.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between GPTBot and ClaudeBot?
GPTBot is operated by OpenAI (GPTBot is OpenAI's training crawler. OpenAI says it crawls "content that may be used in training our generative AI foundation models".) while ClaudeBot is operated by Anthropic (ClaudeBot is Anthropic's training crawler. Anthropic says it collects "web content that could potentially contribute to" model training.). They use different user-agent strings (GPTBot vs ClaudeBot) and must be blocked separately in robots.txt.
Should I block GPTBot or ClaudeBot?
Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot carry the same safety rating (Safe). Your decision should come down to whether you want your content used by OpenAI versus Anthropic, and whether each bot's purpose (training, search, or user requests) aligns with your content strategy.
Does blocking GPTBot or ClaudeBot hurt SEO?
GPTBot: Low - No SEO ranking impact. ClaudeBot: Low - No SEO ranking impact. Neither is a traditional search-ranking crawler, so blocking them does not affect Google or Bing rankings, but it may reduce your visibility in AI-generated answers.
How do I block both GPTBot and ClaudeBot?
Add both user-agent groups to your robots.txt: "User-agent: GPTBot" with "Disallow: /" and "User-agent: ClaudeBot" with "Disallow: /". Remember robots.txt is voluntary; combine with server-level rules for enforcement.
How to block each bot
Block GPTBot in robots.txt
User-agent: GPTBot Disallow: /
Block ClaudeBot in robots.txt
User-agent: ClaudeBot Disallow: /
Setting GPTBot, ClaudeBot and the rest in one go? Tick both in the robots.txt generator (265+ presets), then confirm the result with the AI crawler checker.
Are GPTBot and ClaudeBot allowed on YOUR site?
Run a free check to see exactly which AI crawlers can access your website, plus your AI Visibility Score.
Free AI Crawler Access Check